Re: Ora-600 on 10.1.0.3 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 3))

The hidden parameter did the trick -- I forgot that the Metalink main search doesn't query bugs. I'm being stupid today. I should report to Oracle that this issue persists on 10.1.0.3.

Adam

Parker, Matthew wrote:

>Check out
>Note:285906.1
>And previous bug for 10.1.0.2 (3599503).
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Adam Donahue
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:54 PM
>To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>Subject: Ora-600 on 10.1.0.3 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 3))
>
>Folks,
>
>We're encountering an ora-600 from the following statement, run in against a 10g database:
>
>ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qctVCO:csform], [0], [0], [0], [0], [1], [1], [0]
>
>Anyone seen this? It happens when we issue an update with a two-level subselect as part of the column list, e.g., update tab set col = ( select ... where col2 in ( select ... ) ) ) (not correlated). I'll send more SQL if anyone can confirm they've seen the issue. (Can't really send it as-is for security reasons.)
>
>I've searched Metalink, the ORA-600 lookup tool, Google and some other sources to no avail.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam
>
>
>
>--
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l