Re: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

----- Original Message -----

From: Jared.Still@radisys.com

To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 18:34

Subject: RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

MetaLink is an official Oracle support mechanism for paid subscribers.

Please be careful about cutting and pasting documentation from MetaLink
into a mailing list.  Quoting parts of a MetaLink document may be OK.

Please do not quote entire articles, and *especially* do not cut and paste
forum articles, partiularly with the names of the of posters.

I haven't been contacted by an Oracle attorney in a while now, and am
looking forward to mantaining the status quo.


Jared ( List Owner)

"Juan Miranda" <j.miranda@sermatica.es> Sent by: ml-errors@fatcity.com  12/15/2003 01:44 AM  Please respond to ORACLE-L

To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@fatcity.com>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

 
I have a system with RH AS 2.1 in production and is very very fast and reliable.
The server is a Proliant with 8GB RAM and 2x Intel Xeon.
Oracle installation was easy, only take care if you have big memory.
Also remenber to update the kernel. The predetermined donīt let start database.
 
I tried RH AS 3 and Oracle installation and there are a lot of problems.
Itīs nearly almost essential to read this http://www.puschitz.com/InstallingOracle9i.shtml.
 
Anyway I think RH is a good S.O.
 
Look at Metalink:
 
Unix Installation/OS: RDBMS Technical Forum

Displayed below are the messages of the selected thread.

Thread Status: Active

From: ..

RDBMS Version: 9.2.0.1.0
Operating System and Version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 ES
Error Number (if applicable):
Product (i.e. SQL*Loader, Import, etc.):
Product Version:

.....

---

De: ml-errors@fatcity.com [mailto:ml-errors@fatcity.com] En nombre de Paul Drake
Enviado el: viernes, 12 de diciembre de 2003 23:24
Para: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Asunto: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

Has anyone kicked the tires on RH AS 3.0?

There is a strong possibility that in a migration early next year, that a client wants to move off of MS w2k adv svr and onto either RH AS or SLES (they are an HP (compaq) shop).

It seems like a bad idea to start them off on RH AS 2.1 now, when they likely won't take the system into production until after close of the first quarter.

thanks,

Paul

---

Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Eric King
  INET: erickingus_at_hotmail.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).