Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: dbms_stats
Yes. At least I was before reverting back to ANALYZE. For our little 30GB
DB, there's little penalty for non-parallel stats gathering on Saturdays.
Then again, one could ANALYZE multiple tables at once to regain some
parallelism in stats gathering...
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator rjesse_at_qtiworld.com Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:19 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Rich, I went thru the archives. Are you using the option 'cascade=>true' for gather_table_stats?
-----Original Message-----
Jesse, Rich
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Yes -- same platform and version. If you look on the list archives
(fatcity.com, for example) for a subject of "Burned by DBMS_STATS **AGAIN**"
back in April 2003, you may get some insight.
There are also known bugs in GATHER_SCHEMA_STATS in 8i. The recommendation is to iteratively call GATHER_TABLE_STATS.
GL!
Rich
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jesse, Rich INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-LReceived on Thu Dec 04 2003 - 09:34:42 CST
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).