Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RE: Separate Indexes and Data

RE: RE: Separate Indexes and Data

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:09:32 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005D1863.20030930100932@fatcity.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rgaffuri_at_cox.net [mailto:rgaffuri_at_cox.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: RE: Separate Indexes and Data
>
>
> the defrag paper was written back in 1998 I believe. Uniform
> extents were a good solution pre-9i. We use them here on our

I haven't been following this thread closely, but why are uniform extents no longer good for 9i?

> 8i databases. I stick with an uniform 5m extent size even
> though I have tables that can fit into 128k extents, but feel
> that the overall time savings by using 1 extent size makes up
> for this.
>
> unfortunately unlike most systems we cannot break up our
> tables into different tablespaces. We use transportable
> tablespaces to batch publish data to data marts. New
> tablespaces mean additional transportable tablespaces and
> more places for stuff to go wrong.
>
> I saw some posts on dejanews recently from some pretty
> experienced DBAs stating that there may be 'flaws' in
> auto-allocate leading to poor extent sizes that leads to

I don't believe it's a flaw, it's by design. At least according to Tom Kyte's new book (first chapter's on the web) it is, which is why I can't see me using it for our DBs.

> fragmentation. I believe Rachel Carmichael made a post on
> here a few months back with the similiar experience(could be
> wrong). Due to even the 'small' chance of flaws in
> auto-allocate, Im thinking of waiting for version 10g before
> using it. Just to be safe. Not worth risking a defrag on a
> production system.

Rich

Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
rjesse_at_qtiworld.com                  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue Sep 30 2003 - 13:09:32 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US