| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: shared memory issues in 9.2.0.3
If you are using java objects then consider it to increae it to 100M or near
about it. You can check free memory in java pool before deciding...
Regards
Rafiq
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 13:39:54 -0800
java pool size is set to 60 M in our environment.
sai
M Rafiq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you using java or by default any java objects installed. Ckeck for size
of java pool which has default of 20M. If yes, try to increase size of java
pool to min 50M. I have read some place that in newer version this 4031
message is misleading and may be result of java pool size.
Regards
Rafiq
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 10:49:46 -0800
hi
we have upgraded a database from 8.1.7.4 on aix 4.3 to
9.2.0.3 on 5l and was running fine for the past two
weeks.
it all started day-before-yesterday when job queue
coordinator started thrwoing 4031 errora and dbwr
crashed eventually. we increased the shared pool and
again the crash happened the next day.
in 8i the shared memory was 120M and i had a shared
memory of 200Mb initally in 9i (dont know why??)
,later increased to 300mb after the first crash,then
to 650mb after the second crash(oracle's
suggestion).oracle send me some events to be set in
init.ota for 4031 errors and the trace that generated
it seems has very little info to debug..not
surprised..job queue coordinator,apparently wakes up
every 5 seconds and there is some bug filed regarding
excessive usage of sga by job queue coordinator.
oracle suggested about the _job_queue_interval
parameter and i went ahead and put that in setting it
to the same value as in 8i. oracle sent me a script
which added sharable_mem from v$db_objcect_cache and
v$sqlarea and told me that i have to double the shared
memeory. i dont hv a clue though i think this is not a
right way to check the shared pool size. also the
application is the same.nothing has changed and the
number of processes in the database at any point of
time is less than 50!!! does 9i require 5 times the
size of share pool of 8i ????
has anyone faced this kind of issue? i have been
sitting in front of the system for the past two days
trying to figure out what is happening? cant question
oracle..but why really mess around with job queue
processes when that simple daemon has been working
fine in all versions?
anycase,gurus please help me out on this.
thanks
sai
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Sai Selvaganesan
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: M Rafiq
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting servicesto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Sat Jun 07 2003 - 19:57:30 CDT
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 |
 |