Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Which method is more efficient
Hello everyone,
I have a question for the group of which method is more efficient.
To set the stage my company has a process to load part changes from vendors into the tables in an 8.1.7.4 Oracle database with archiving on and this database has a standby database at disaster recovery site, so nologging is not an option.
There is a discussion going on as to which method is more effective for updating the information in a table. In looking at effectiveness, I am looking at reducing the amount of redo information produced and having the database do the least amount of work.
The size of the record is 1843 bytes and the distribution of field sizes:
2 fields varchar2(240).
1 field varchar2(150)
15 fields varchar2(50)
1 field varchar2(3)
2 fields varchar2(20) 4 fields varchar2(40) 3 fields varchar2(1) 2 fields varchar2(25)
In the past couple of months the average number of fields changed per record was 3 to 4 fields per record.
Thanks for your help,
Bryan Rodrigues
Oracle DBA
Elcom, Inc.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Rodrigues, Bryan
INET: BRodrigues_at_elcom.com
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services ---------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Wed May 28 2003 - 10:49:49 CDT