Re: Oracle, IBM fight of whose DB is more manageable

It's an oxymoron, I'd say.

Gogala, Mladen wrote:

>What is a predictable corporate environment? I know of no such
>thing.
>
>Mladen Gogala
>Oracle DBA
>Phone:(203) 459-6855
>Email:mgogala_at_oxhp.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 4:50 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>"Both will do most jobs, with Oracle excelling in the high-end, highly
>available marketplace. MSSQL costs far less, both in purchase and TCO
>and excels in the 2-4 processor predictable corporate environment
>without a HA requirement."
>
>Cheers
>
>Niall
>
>
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mogens_N=F8rgaard?=
  INET: mln_at_miracleas.dk

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).