Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: 10053 trace

Re: 10053 trace

From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:49:44 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005A3CC4.20030527194944@fatcity.com>


At 04:15 PM 5/27/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>hi gurus
>i am trying to generate 10053 trace in 9i and have met
>with no success.
>
>i used both 'alter session set events' and
>'dbms_system.set_ev'.
>
>i used the above two to generate 10053 trace for the
>same query in 8i w/o problems.
>
>has anything changed in 9i?
>can you please help me on this?

There is no difference in creating the 10053 event trace in 9i as compared to 8i. The trace itself is a bit different in some areas. What is the problem you are having? No trace at all? Can you greate an ordinary sql_trace and find it in the udump directory? BTW what platform?

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Wolfgang Breitling
  INET: breitliw_at_centrexcc.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue May 27 2003 - 22:49:44 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US