Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Raid 0+1 or Raid 1+0

RE: Raid 0+1 or Raid 1+0

From: Stephen Lee <Stephen.Lee_at_DTAG.Com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 06:41:52 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0059FC10.20030522064152@fatcity.com>

I wonder if there would be some difference in write speed with one versus the other. The only thing I ever played with was stripe then mirror. Stripe then mirror was never a problem for me because I didn't wait around for another drive to fail. Most software and hardware that does this also allows you to set up hot spares.

> -----Original Message-----
> Hi all
>
> Some documents I read says use RAID 0 + 1 but then if you look at what
> happens when a single drive fails you switch over to the
> other side of the
> raid, thus you can only tolerate 1 drive failure before a second drive
> failure brings the storage system down,
>
> Raid 0 + 1 = Stripe + Mirror which equates to Oracle SAME methodology
>
> Whereas
>
> Using Raid 1 + 0 gives the same performance but you can
> handle multiple
> drive failures.
>
> Views and comments please.
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Stephen Lee
  INET: Stephen.Lee_at_DTAG.Com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu May 22 2003 - 09:41:52 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US