Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Why "multiple of 5" blocks --- was Re: buffer cache -once aga

RE: Why "multiple of 5" blocks --- was Re: buffer cache -once aga

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 13:37:30 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.005981CD.20030513133730@fatcity.com>


Maybe they used one of those 'flawed' Pentium chips to compute

select power(2,2)
from dual
/

Raj




Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 5:07 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L again

I've often asked myself the same question. 5 is SO computer-unfriendly.
(Especially when you realise that nowadays the Oracle code seems to assume
for convenience that there are 1024 milliseconds in a second) And yes, at least v6. Possibly a hangover from something even earlier.

Regards
Jonathan Lewis


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jamadagni, Rajendra
  INET: Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L

(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Tue May 13 2003 - 16:37:30 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US