Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Oracle License for Training

Re: Oracle License for Training

From: Mogens Nørgaard <mln_at_MiracleAS.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:44:51 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0054C67C.20030213104451@fatcity.com>


Whoever is going to help do it, please make sure it has a really good wait interface from the beginning :).

Orr, Steve wrote:

> For me the question is not "If?" but "When?"
>
> Any prognostications?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cary Millsap [mailto:cary.millsap_at_hotsos.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:54 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Oracle License for Training
>
>
> Mark my words, it will happen.
>
> ...The MySQL part, not the outsourcing part. :)
>
>
> Cary Millsap
> Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
> http://www.hotsos.com
>
> Upcoming events:
> - RMOUG Training Days 2003, Mar 5-6 Denver
> - Hotsos Clinic 101, Mar 25-27 London
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Jared.Still_at_radisys.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:59 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
> If MySql continues as planned, I think Oracle will
> find it a force to be reckoned with, much as MS
> has discovered to be true about Linux.
>
> Of course by that time, according to the latest IT
> business intelligence as seen in Computer World,
> most of our jobs will have been outsourced by then,
> and it wont' matter much.
>
> Jared
>
>
>
>
>
> "Weiss, Rick" <rweiss_at_state.mt.us>
> Sent by: root_at_fatcity.com
> 02/11/2003 03:04 PM
> Please respond to ORACLE-L
>
>
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: Oracle License for Training
>
>
> A question for the DBA Gods on this list:
>
> Is it worth the time/effort to download MySQL and learn it? Is there
> going
> to be a viable (meaning $$) market for the product in the future? Or
> should
> I leave all the egg$ in the Oracle basket?
>
> Musing for fun and profit.
>
> Rick Weiss
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:34 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> MS SQL costing less than Oracle is only partly true.
>
> If you load up MS with the extras that constitute a std
> feature set on Oracle, Oracle is very competitive.
>
> Been lots of comparisons on that.
>
> Now PostgreSQL and MySQL, those *are* less expensize than
> MS SQL and Oracle. :)
>
> Jared
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Weiss, Rick
> INET: rweiss_at_state.mt.us
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mogens_N=F8rgaard?=
  INET: mln_at_MiracleAS.dk

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Feb 13 2003 - 12:44:51 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US