Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle License for Training

RE: Oracle License for Training

From: Orr, Steve <sorr_at_rightnow.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:09:00 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0054C1D3.20030213090900@fatcity.com>


For me the question is not "If?" but "When?"

Any prognostications?

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:54 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Mark my words, it will happen.

...The MySQL part, not the outsourcing part. :)

Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com

Upcoming events:
- RMOUG Training Days 2003, Mar 5-6 Denver - Hotsos Clinic 101, Mar 25-27 London

-----Original Message-----
Jared.Still_at_radisys.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

If MySql continues as planned, I think Oracle will find it a force to be reckoned with, much as MS has discovered to be true about Linux.

Of course by that time, according to the latest IT business intelligence as seen in Computer World, most of our jobs will have been outsourced by then, and it wont' matter much.

Jared

"Weiss, Rick" <rweiss_at_state.mt.us>
Sent by: root_at_fatcity.com
 02/11/2003 03:04 PM
 Please respond to ORACLE-L  

        To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>

        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: Oracle License for Training


A question for the DBA Gods on this list:

Is it worth the time/effort to download MySQL and learn it? Is there going
to be a viable (meaning $$) market for the product in the future? Or should
I leave all the egg$ in the Oracle basket?

Musing for fun and profit.

Rick Weiss

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

MS SQL costing less than Oracle is only partly true.

If you load up MS with the extras that constitute a std feature set on Oracle, Oracle is very competitive.

Been lots of comparisons on that.

Now PostgreSQL and MySQL, those *are* less expensize than MS SQL and Oracle. :)

Jared
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--

Author: Weiss, Rick
  INET: rweiss_at_state.mt.us

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--

Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: sorr_at_rightnow.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Thu Feb 13 2003 - 11:09:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US