Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: HP-UX 11.0/8.1.6.2.0/Optimizer

RE: HP-UX 11.0/8.1.6.2.0/Optimizer

From: John Kanagaraj <john.kanagaraj_at_hds.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:23:34 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00486082.20020624162334@fatcity.com>


Mike,

> Shazzam. Back to 2 minutes. Huh? But Optimizer-mode is RULE!!
>
> How? Why? I look stupid and so does my whole DBA group.
> Does anybody have any insights about this behavior?

Contrary to common understanding, the Cost based optimizer is 'forced' in certain situations even if the mode is RULE. Examples are: Use of hints other than RULE, Partitioned tables and indexes, Index-organized tables, Reverse key indexes, Function-based indexes, SAMPLE clauses in a SELECT statement, Parallel execution and parallel DML (i.e. presence of DEGREE on Tables/Indexes), etc. Was this the case? This was the focus of my paper at IOUG... John Kanagaraj
Oracle Applications DBA
DBSoft Inc
(W): 408-970-7002

The manuals for Oracle are here: http://tahiti.oracle.com The manual for Life is here: http://www.gospelcom.net

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Mon Jun 24 2002 - 19:23:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US