Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: NOLOGGING

RE: NOLOGGING

From: Amar Kumar Padhi <TS2017_at_emirates.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:16:23 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.0033797C.20010625214621@fatcity.com>

True,
but somebody on the list talked about "delete <tabnam> nologgin". I did not find immense benifit in this option. Any views on this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha [mailto:oraperfman_at_yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 6:10 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: NOLOGGING

Ramon,

That is not true. Setting NOLOGGING at the object level only reduces the amount of redo generated for bulk INSERT operations with the /*+ APPEND */ hint, certain partition administration operations and of course during the creation of the object itself. It does not eliminate generation of redo during a delete operation.

Attached is a sample output from a couple of delete commands, one with LOGGING and the other with NOLOGGING: Cheers,

Gaja


Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha
Director, Storage Management Products,
Quest Software, Inc.
Co-author - Oracle Performance Tuning 101

Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Received on Tue Jun 26 2001 - 00:16:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US