Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Tuning, RAID5, and fragmentation and DBWR
Hey Dana,
Are you kidding? A GS140 running OVMS would be my choice of OS/Hardware! OK, OS bigotry aside... ;)
The RAID5 *WILL* give you performance problems! RAID5 is the worst performer for write operations. The LGWR,and associated slave processes (and to a somewhat lesser extent, the DBWR) WILL complain LOUDLY. I hope for your sake that the GS140 at least has a lotta memory. CPU-wise, it's 2.5-to-3 times faster than our 4100 5/400, depending on MHz. CPU's not going to be your bottleneck, though.
But, if that's all you have to work with, try a few of these:
Ideally, if you could get them to just keep your datafiles on the RAID5, but have at least 5 more JBOD (non-RAIDed) drives to put the other Oracle files on -- 1 for each of 2 control files, 1 for each of 2 sets of redo logs, and at least 1 more for the archives, preferrably 2 if you can, for duplexing them as well. Yes, that's one 9GB or 18GB drive to store a single 10-100MB control file. Drives SAs nuts, unless you happen to be an SA/DBA. :)
If you can, have them get you the 15K-spin Seagates. Those puppies fly! Ahh, if only in a perfect world...
HTH! Good luck!
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA
Disclaimer: This is just my opinion. Do what you want with it, but don't hold me, Quad/Graphics, it's subsidiaries or employees accountable for your (in)actions based on what's in this email!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dana mn [mailto:danamn2000_at_yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:51
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: Tuning, RAID5, and fragmentation and DBWR
>
>
>
> Thanks Dave, Don, and Patrice.
>
> It's hardware RAID, a Compaq GS140 machine, and Oracle on VMS [not my
> choice of OS/hardware]. Limited to one large RAID5 volume.
>
> I'd like to make the most of what's there, because for political
> reasons nothing else will change.
>
> Does it make any sense to increase the number of database writer
> processes on a system with nothing but RAID5 space? Looks like there's
> a bit of slowdown on checkpoints.
This message has been scanned for viruses with Trend Micro's Interscan VirusWall.
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jesse, Rich INET: Rich.Jesse_at_qtiworld.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Tue Feb 27 2001 - 15:47:57 CST