| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: MetaSlop -- More Screeching and Droning.
OH
MAN!!! Once again Ross has gone on before the rest of us and I just
can't say anything after that!! Apache running on linux based Palm
Pilots....oh...oh the pain in my stomach....:)
<FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: root_at_fatcity.com
[mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Mohan, RossSent:
Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:26 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: MetaSlop -- More Screeching and
Droning.
Our own esteemed Paul Baumgartel wants to know how our
equally esteemed Kevin would have handled the
MetaCrack announcement.
There are several possibilities, depending on what is
ACTUALLY going on in the Armani Sweatshop on Ellison
Lane.
Scenario One:
ATTENTION: Oracle Customers -- Special DBA
Announcement.
PASS THIS TO YOUR DBA!
No doubt you have recently seen performance on MetaLink
do down like a career hooker on a Presidential
candidate. There is a reason for this, and here it
is:
We had a cowboy DBA who stayed up too late one night
reading "Oracle Latches, Waits, and Blinking Lights"
by Tom Swift. (Doubtless you are aware of this classic
review of oracle internals.) Unfortunately,
aforementioned cowboy badly misinterpreted the settings of <FONT
size=2>the _db_block_write_flush_or_scan_depth_increment_rigidity
parameter and really screwed up our systems. After out
"Global IT Group" got on the problem ( ok, the "other"
cowboy rookie DBA we have ) he tried everything he
could, and actually worsened things by setting the
"_please_make_it_better" parameter to TRUE, as opposed
to IMMEDIATE. As you may know, this undoc parameter
only works in TRUE mode for Oracle8, and MetaLink is still running
on Oracle 7.2.3.4.2.
Finally, we called in someone competent from our front line
support. She had actually quit, and was packing her
desk in disgust (at not being allowed to properly
address customer requests ever since the "iTar" process performed
auto-deletes on all online requests) but was stopped
by an alert middle manager for "one last favor". After
she set the "_divert_funds_from_marketing" parameter <FONT
size=2>to TRUE, everything came back for a handful of minutes.
During this brief operational period, we had a "staggering"
number of requests hit our front end webservers (
Apache on Linux-based Palm Pilots ) and MetaLink could
not respond to the seven requests simultaneously.
We are currently throwing hardware at the problem, and hope to
be able to provide roughly the same level of service
you'd expect at a local Seven-Eleven any day now.
So Long, and Thanks for All the Power Units!!!!
################ END METALINK MESSAGE #######################################There are other scenarios, but my hourglass just returned from my metalink search, so i've got to go now.........
-----Original Message----- Sent:
Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:51 PM To: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L
Man, these guys just invite the wise-ass comment, don't
they? Such as:
Well maybe if the product worked better/was less confusing/had
better documentation we wouldn't all be in
Metalink! Oh no! If 4 new servers brought the
system to its knees just think how bad it'll be when
the rest of the hardware arrives! 4 new
top-of-the-line servers, just think what that'll do to their power
unit charges!
Plus I can't rid myself of the image of us all 'staggering' to
Metalink for help.
Jim
>>> dgoulet_at_vicr.com 02/27/01 01:21PM
>>> For those interested, right from the
horses mouth, or other orifice as you desire:
News & Notes <FONT
size=2>MetaLink Performance - An Update
 |
 |