Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> MetaSlop -- More Screeching and Droning.
Our own esteemed Paul Baumgartel wants to know how our equally esteemed Kevin would have handled the MetaCrack announcement.
There are several possibilities, depending on what is ACTUALLY going on in the Armani Sweatshop on Ellison Lane.
Scenario One:
ATTENTION: Oracle Customers -- Special DBA Announcement.
PASS THIS TO YOUR DBA! No doubt you have recently seen performance on MetaLink do down like a career hooker on a Presidential candidate. There is a reason for this, and here it is:
We had a cowboy DBA who stayed up too late one night reading "Oracle Latches, Waits, and Blinking Lights" by Tom Swift. (Doubtless you are aware of this classic review of oracle internals.) Unfortunately, aforementioned cowboy badly misinterpreted the settings of the _db_block_write_flush_or_scan_depth_increment_rigidity parameter and really screwed up our systems. After out "Global IT Group" got on the problem ( ok, the "other" cowboy rookie DBA we have ) he tried everything he could, and actually worsened things by setting the "_please_make_it_better" parameter to TRUE, as opposed to IMMEDIATE. As you may know, this undoc parameter only works in TRUE mode for Oracle8, and MetaLink is still running on Oracle 7.2.3.4.2.
Finally, we called in someone competent from our front line support. She had actually quit, and was packing her desk in disgust (at not being allowed to properly address customer requests ever since the "iTar" process performed auto-deletes on all online requests) but was stopped by an alert middle manager for "one last favor". After she set the "_divert_funds_from_marketing" parameter to TRUE, everything came back for a handful of minutes.
During this brief operational period, we had a "staggering" number of requests hit our front end webservers ( Apache on Linux-based Palm Pilots ) and MetaLink could not respond to the seven requests simultaneously.
We are currently throwing hardware at the problem, and hope to be able to provide roughly the same level of service you'd expect at a local Seven-Eleven any day now.
So Long, and Thanks for All the Power Units!!!!
################ END METALINK MESSAGE #######################################
There are other scenarios, but my hourglass just returned from my metalink search, so i've got to go now.........
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Baumgartel [mailto:PaulB_at_instipro.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 3:21 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: RE: MetaSlop
And if you were running a comparable system, what would *you* say?
Paul Baumgartel
InstiPro, Inc.
paul.baumgartel_at_instipro.com
212 813-0829 x103 (office)
917 549-4717 (mobile)
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Man, these guys just invite the wise-ass comment, don't they? Such as:
Well maybe if the product worked better/was less confusing/had better documentation we wouldn't all be in Metalink! Oh no! If 4 new servers brought the system to its knees just think how bad it'll be when the rest of the hardware arrives! 4 new top-of-the-line servers, just think what that'll do to their power unit charges!
Plus I can't rid myself of the image of us all 'staggering' to Metalink for help.
Jim
>>> dgoulet_at_vicr.com 02/27/01 01:21PM >>> For those interested, right from the horses mouth, or other orifice as you desire:
News & Notes
MetaLink Performance - An Update
We apologize for the slow response times recently on MetaLink. All over
the
world our customers are coming to and using this valuable
knowledge base in staggering numbers. Our Global IT team are working these
performance issues as their number one priority.
What is Being Done
This week four new front-end web servers were brought on line to help
manage
the load. Additional hardware has been purchased and will
arrive soon which will make a significant improvement in performance.
We appreciate your patience during this time of significant growth in
MetaLink
usage.
Thanks,
The MetaLink Team
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author:Received on Tue Feb 27 2001 - 15:34:18 CST
INET: dgoulet_at_vicr.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jim Conboy
INET: Jim.Conboy_at_trw.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Paul Baumgartel
INET: PaulB_at_instipro.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).