LMT MAXEXTENTS for 8K Blocksize

Hi List,

I have been reading through the 8i Tuning & Performance Guide, and remembered a topic on the list a few weeks back discussing the maximum number of extents for a LMT.

In the Tuning I/O section of this guide there is a reference to this stating:

---snip---

Evaluating Unlimited Extents

Even though an object may have unlimited extents, this does not mean that having
a large number of small extents is acceptable. For optimal performance you may
decide to reduce the number of extents.

Extent maps list all extents for a particular segment. The number of extents entries
per Oracle block depends on operating system block size and platform. Although
an extent is a data structure inside Oracle, the size of this data structure depends on
the platform. Accordingly, this affects the number of extents Oracle can store in a
single operating system block. Typically, this value is as follows:

Block Size (KB)         Maximum Number of Extents
2                       121
4                       255
8                       504
16                      1032
32                      2070

For optimal performance, you should be able to read the extent map with a single
I/O. Performance degrades if multiple I/Os are necessary for a full table scan to get
the extent map.

Avoid dynamic extension in dictionary-mapped tablespaces. For dictionary-mapped tablespaces, do not let the number of extents exceed 1,000. If extent allocation is local, then do not have more than 2,000 extents. Having too many extents reduces performance when dropping or truncating tables.
---snip---

Now, I also remember somebody stating that MAXEXTENTS should be set to 504 for an 8K block size, and he was flamed.. I also added to this, and now appologise..

Now, the question arises :

I created an LMT with the default storage parameters, and Oracle in its infinite wisdom, gave a MAXEXTENTS value of 2147483645!!

A few more than 2000, was Larry thinking of his bank balance when he decided on this? :)

You know, it's so great that they put these little "pearls" of wisdom in to tuning guides, that you have to dig in to, just to find a ghost of an answer, but when it comes to putting them as standard in to the bloody product they give stupid values that would grind a system to a halt if ever allowed to happen!! Would it not then make sense to just set this as a default??

Am I being naive? LOL..

Can we all join hands and shout "Thank you LARRY!!!!"

Mark Received on Thu Feb 15 2001 - 09:03:22 CST