RE: rollback after 0 rows affected

On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:40:25 -0800, Steve Adams wrote:

>If you are not concerned about the retention of a slot in the SGA transaction
>table, then the only impact of not terminating the transaction explicitly with a
>COMMIT or ROLLBACK is that the snapshot SCN for consistent reads for subsequent
>statements will reflect the point in time at which the delete operation was
>attempted. If your next statement needs a new snapshot SCN for consistent reads
>then the transaction should be explicitly terminated. There is no performance

Thanks Steve, Jared, and others,

This was very informative, and as always on this list, I learned a lot more than I thought asking the question ;-)

• Sincerely, Fred Frederik Lindberg, CTO, CheetahMail

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Frederik Lindberg
  INET: fred_at_cheetahmail.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).