Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Consistent Gets?
I believe it's because the query that returned rows had to assemble a result set, hence the extra consistent gets. The second query had no result set, so much less work was done (less consistent gets).
>>> paul_g_parker_at_yahoo.com 02/12/01 12:30PM >>>
Hi all,
Could someone attempt to explain the difference in the no. of "consistent gets" reported for these 2 queries?
I have a table (TEST1) made up of 11,333 blocks. No indexes on this table. I run two queries, both reported to do full table scans (as expected), one returning all the rows from the table and one with a bogus condition resulting in no rows returned. I expected, that since both queries did full table scans, that the amount of IO would be the same. Yet the query which returned data did 3 times as much IO as the one which did not. Output follows :
12:08:16 T10-SERVCBO-CH> @p2
12:08:22 T10-SERVCBO-CH> set autotrace traceonly
exp stat
12:08:22 T10-SERVCBO-CH> select 12:08:22 2 * 12:08:22 3 from 12:08:22 4 test1 12:08:22 5 where 12:08:22 6 pay_dealer_date >= '01/01/2000' 12:08:22 7 -- and state_code = 'AB' ----BOGUS CONDITION
375043 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:55.46
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE 1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'TEST1'
Statistics
0 recursive calls 15 db block gets 35581 consistent gets 10575 physical reads 0 redo size66817080 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 2775646 bytes received via SQL*Net from
client 25004 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 375043 rows processed
12:09:18 T10-SERVCBO-CH> ed p2
12:09:33 T10-SERVCBO-CH> @p2
12:09:35 T10-SERVCBO-CH> set autotrace traceonly
exp stat
12:09:35 T10-SERVCBO-CH> select 12:09:35 2 * 12:09:35 3 from 12:09:35 4 test1 12:09:35 5 where 12:09:35 6 pay_dealer_date >= '01/01/2000' 12:09:35 7 and state_code = 'AB' ---- BOGUSCONDITION
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:03.43
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE 1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'TEST1'
Statistics
0 recursive calls 15 db block gets 11337 consistent gets 10573 physical reads 0 redo size 1860 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 313 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 0 rows processed
12:09:38 T10-SERVCBO-CH> spool off
What am I missing here? Any help appreciated.
Thanx
Paul
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Paul Parker INET: paul_g_parker_at_yahoo.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Tim Sawmiller INET: sawmillert_at_state.mi.us Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Mon Feb 12 2001 - 13:26:53 CST