Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Btmap Index
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C079A4.C8F6F880 Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
RE: Date comparison questionI ran into a similar problem a while back. =
If the database is set to use the CBO, it might not use the index. =
Someone on this list gave a great reason why, perhaps the table is just =
very small and the CBO just decided to do a full table scan instead. =
You could use a hint and tell it to use rule based on that query and it =
will use the index on the where clause. That's what I did. The =
question is, how big is the table and how much data does it have in it? =
If it is not a lot, there really is nothing to be concerned about. Oh =
yeah, and almost 100% positive that there is no setting in the init file =
for the index. =20
Sincerely,
Kevin
Hi,
=20
Is there any init.ora parameter that needs to be turned to activate =
bitmap indexes?
I have a bitmap index on one column C1, but when i examine the explain =
pan of the=20
query: " select C1, b, c from table TT where C1 in ('dd','ff')" , it =
looks like it is not using
the index but doing a full table scan...
=20
thanks
-krishna
-----Original Message-----
From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Jacques =
Kilchoer
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 2:01 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Date comparison question
> -----Original Message-----=20
> From: Lisa Yates [mailto:cosnit_at_creighton.edu]=20
> Sent: lundi, 8. janvier 2001 11:27=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
Well, I guess my suggestion that run_date may contain a "BCE" = (before common era) date was not the answer to your problem. Maybe I = misunderstood the issue. When you say "why doesn't the query ever = return", do you mean it returns zero rows, or do you mean that the query = is taking an abnormally long time? If it's taking an abnormally long = time, an explain plan on the two queries may reveal the cause.
Jacques R. Kilcho=EBr=20
(949) 754-8816=20
Quest Software, Inc.=20
8001 Irvine Center Drive=20
Irvine, California 92618=20
U.S.A.=20
http://www.quest.com=20
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C079A4.C8F6F880 Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: Date comparison question</TITLE> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I ran into a similar problem a while =back. If=20
</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sincerely,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Kevin</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Btmap Index</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20class=3D953563822-08012001>Hi,</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D953563822-08012001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN = class=3D953563822-08012001>Is=20
where C1 in ('dd','ff')" , it looks like it is not=20
using</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D953563822-08012001>the=20
index but doing a full table scan...</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D953563822-08012001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D953563822-08012001>thanks</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D953563822-08012001>-krishna</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV align=3Dleft class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> root_at_fatcity.com =
[mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Jacques=20 Kilchoer<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 08, 2001 2:01 = PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: Date = comparison=20
question<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<P><FONT size=3D2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT =
size=3D2>>=20
From: Lisa Yates [<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:cosnit_at_creighton.edu">mailto:cosnit_at_creighton.edu</A>]</FO=
NT>=20
<BR><FONT size=3D2>> Sent: lundi, 8. janvier 2001 11:27</FONT> = <BR><FONT=20
size=3D2>> </FONT><BR><FONT size=3D2>> Why doesn't this query = ever=20
return...</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3D2>> </FONT><BR><FONT = size=3D2>> where=20
run_date =3D to_date('01-03-2001 16:34:59','mm-dd-yyyy = </FONT><BR><FONT=20
size=3D2>> hh24:mi:ss')</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3D2>> = </FONT><BR><FONT=20
size=3D2>> but this query does....</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3D2>> =
</FONT><BR><FONT size=3D2>> where to_char(run_date) =3D=20 to_char(to_date('01-03-2001</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3D2>>=20 16:34:59','mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'))</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3D2>>=20 </FONT><BR><FONT size=3D2>> and so does this query....</FONT> = <BR><FONT=20
size=3D2>> </FONT><BR><FONT size=3D2>> where = to_char(run_date,'mm-dd-yyyy=20
hh24:mi:ss') =3D '01-03-2001 </FONT><BR><FONT size=3D2>> =
16:34:59'</FONT>=20
</P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Well, I guess my suggestion that run_date may = contain a=20
"BCE" (before common era) date was not the answer to your problem. = Maybe I=20
misunderstood the issue. When you say "why doesn't the query ever = return",=20
do you mean it returns zero rows, or do you mean that the query is = taking an=20
abnormally long time? If it's taking an abnormally long time, an = explain=20
plan on the two queries may reveal the cause.</FONT></P> <P><FONT size=3D2>Jacques R. Kilcho=EBr</FONT> <BR><FONT = size=3D2>(949)=20
754-8816</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3D2>Quest Software, Inc.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT size=3D2>8001 Irvine Center Drive</FONT> <BR><FONT = size=3D2>Irvine,=20
California 92618</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3D2>U.S.A.</FONT> <BR><FONT = Received on Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:57:01 CST