This is one of the very FEW things I disagree with
Steve on. I ALWAYS multiplex (and mirror).
Mirroring alone does
nothing for you if a clueless admin type
removes your redo log file without know what he is
removing (it's happend at other sites).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsands_at_lendleaserei.com [mailto:rsands_at_lendleaserei.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 12:52 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Redo logs on mirrored disks
>
>
>
>
> listers,
>
> Reading through Steve Adams web site, I came across
> the tip that says redo logs should be mirrored or
> multiplexed, but there is no need to do both. The
> explanation makes sense, but I have never run a
> production database without multiplexing redo logs,
> and the thought of doing so is a little scary!! I
> wanted to find out how many other DBA's have taken
> this approach, and if you've tried it, how much of
> performance difference have you seen? Is there any
> increased risk of data loss?
>
> TIA ... Robyn Sands
>
>
> --
> Author:
> INET: rsands_at_lendleaserei.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Mon Jun 12 2000 - 13:30:27 CDT
