| large or small disks [message #113718] |
Tue, 28 August 2001 07:04  |
paul mansfield
Messages: 35
Registered: January 2001
|
Member |
|
|
|
It has been suggested that we should configure some of the disks used by our Oracle databases as 3390 model 9's rather than as 3390 model 3's. This gives them three times the capacity. Has anyone done any benchmarking in this area to see if there is any performance degredation with the larger disks.
|
|
|
|
| Re: large or small disks [message #113722 is a reply to message #113718] |
Fri, 31 August 2001 09:05  |
Subhash Roy
Messages: 24
Registered: January 2001
|
Junior Member |
|
|
: It has been suggested that we should configure some of the disks used by our Oracle databases as 3390 model 9's rather than as 3390 model 3's. This gives them three times the capacity. Has anyone done any benchmarking in this area to see if there is any performance degredation with the larger disks.
: Per Metalink (docid: 23216.997, Oracle is transparent to the selection of the 3390 models. However, in the appendix B of the Aministration manual (Operating System Dependenet Variables section), there is a mention of limitation of file size imposed by the type of the disk models.
|
|
|
|
] 
Blog
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
