change apex 2.1 interface settings [message #523245] |
Fri, 16 September 2011 06:39 |
hudo
Messages: 165 Registered: May 2004
|
Senior Member |
|
|
How can I change the apex 2.1 interface settings permanently ?
I like the view "details" instead of "icons"
and at least 100 displayed rows/items instead of the default 15
|
|
|
|
Re: change apex 2.1 interface settings [message #530182 is a reply to message #530173] |
Sun, 06 November 2011 00:59 |
|
Littlefoot
Messages: 21823 Registered: June 2005 Location: Croatia, Europe
|
Senior Member Account Moderator |
|
|
As far as I can tell, there's no such an option, which would allow you to set the default number of records (for all newly created reports).
However: I never used that Apex version, but ... you might check whether the following exists in yours (I would say it does): in SQL*Plus, connect to APEX_xxxxxx user (in higher, 3.2 version, its name is APEX_030200 so I suppose your user name is APEX_020100). It contains the WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_RPTS table which contains the DISPLAY_ROWS column. A simple UPDATE statement would modify number of records for all existing reports (or, if you include a WHERE clause, you could restrict which ones to modify (or not)):
update wwv_flow_worksheet_rpts set
display_rows = 100
where ...
You should save this statement for future use (or, obviously, modify that number while creating a new report).
As of modifying default view settings (i.e. details instead of icons), it is available in Apex 3.x version (once connected to Apex, you'd go to Application Builder, follow the "Developer preferences" task link and change "Set view mode" value. No idea about your version.
|
|
|
Re: change apex 2.1 interface settings [message #530186 is a reply to message #530182] |
Sun, 06 November 2011 07:28 |
hudo
Messages: 165 Registered: May 2004
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Littlefoot,
thanks for your reply.
I connected as SYSTEM and inspected all tables owned by FLOWS_020100, the mentioned WWV_FLOW_WORKSHEET_RPTS table is not present here. At least you gave me an idea of a basic approach.
Am I right, that SYSTEM is able to perform the mentioned update ?
|
|
|
|