| Weird thing in SQL & PL/SQL forum [message #493713] |
Wed, 09 February 2011 08:42  |
 |
Michel Cadot
Messages: 68718
Registered: March 2007
Location: Saint-Maur, France, https...
|
Senior Member
Account Moderator |
|
|
I don't know if someone else sees the same thing.
In SQL & PL/SQL forum, the topic "Preform math calculation upon dates" at http://www.orafaq.com/forum/t/166852/102589/ is displayed with last update "Wed, 09 February 2011 11:23 By: Michel Cadot" but when you go into the topîc the last update was by cookiemonster (although at the same time).
More, even if I read it again and again, it still appears to me as unread topic in the list.
Anyone else in this case?
Regards
Michel
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Weird thing in SQL & PL/SQL forum [message #493726 is a reply to message #493721] |
Wed, 09 February 2011 09:44  |
 |
ramoradba
Messages: 2457
Registered: January 2009
Location: AndhraPradesh,Hyderabad,I...
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Yes exactly!
But what about this?
Quote:"More, even if I read it again and again, it still appears to me as unread topic in the list"
Same for me.
I have replied to the last message(deleted) and verified from that moment It appears as a read topic to me !
Sriram
[Updated on: Wed, 09 February 2011 09:45] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Weird thing in SQL & PL/SQL forum [message #493728 is a reply to message #493726] |
Wed, 09 February 2011 09:54 |
cookiemonster
Messages: 13960
Registered: September 2008
Location: Rainy Manchester
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I rather suspect that's a knock-on effect from the discrepancy between the last message in the thread and what the forum says is the last message.
Frank Naude should be able to answer for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Weird thing in SQL & PL/SQL forum [message #493761 is a reply to message #493759] |
Wed, 09 February 2011 14:03 |
 |
Barbara Boehmer
Messages: 9100
Registered: November 2002
Location: California, USA
|
Senior Member |
|
|
|
After Cookie Monster's latest reply, it now shows read. Apparently, if anybody replies, then that fixes the problem, but if that reply is deleted, then the problem returns. It looks like maybe an issue where one thing relies on a timestamp of some sort and another relies on an auto-incrementing key and there is some conflict when there are two replies at the same time. When there is another record (reply) added, then the other two are not referenced, so there is no conflict.
|
|
|
|
] 
Blog
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
