Ora -1461 in RAC [message #392884] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 10:02 |
rsreddy28
Messages: 295 Registered: May 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi All,
We are getting the below error in our OEM
Metric Value=ORA-1461 encountered when generating server alert SMG-3500
Time/Line Number=Thu Mar 19 10:11:21 2009/10998
Timestamp=Mar 19, 2009 10:17:54 AM EST
Severity=Warning
Message=ORA-error stack (1461) logged in /opt/oracle/admin/WVOP/bdump/alert_WVOP3.log.
And this is what the contents in the Alert Log file
Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x5eb0.a698b.0], current log tail at RBA [0x5eb0.a7450.0]
Thu Mar 19 10:11:21 2009
ORA-1461 encountered when generating server alert SMG-3500
Thu Mar 19 10:12:42 2009
Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x5eb0.aaaed.0], current log tail at RBA [0x5eb0.ab1bb.0]
Thu Mar 19 10:22:44 2009
Not sure what's the porblem and solution for this .
Can anybody help on this.
Regards,
Raj
|
|
|
|
Re: Ora -1461 in RAC [message #392890 is a reply to message #392884] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 10:18 |
|
Mahesh Rajendran
Messages: 10708 Registered: March 2002 Location: oracleDocoVille
|
Senior Member Account Moderator |
|
|
rsreddy28,
I lost my count of posts asking you to use CODE tags.
In fact, you forced me to switch to monotype fonts so that I read the message in some cases.
Seems you are not getting what CODE tag means
or
Just ignoring the call.
Use CODE tags when posting code/error messages. There is no point in using BOLD tag.
this is your format with BOLD tags
incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x5eb0.a698b.0], current log tail at RBA [0x5eb0.a7450.0]
Thu Mar 19 10:11:21 2009
ORA-1461 encountered when generating server alert SMG-3500
Thu Mar 19 10:12:42 2009
Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x5eb0.aaaed.0], current log tail at RBA [0x5eb0.ab1bb.0]
Thu Mar 19 10:22:44 2009
and this with CODE tags.
incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x5eb0.a698b.0], current log tail at RBA [0x5eb0.a7450.0]
Thu Mar 19 10:11:21 2009
ORA-1461 encountered when generating server alert SMG-3500
Thu Mar 19 10:12:42 2009
Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x5eb0.aaaed.0], current log tail at RBA [0x5eb0.ab1bb.0]
Thu Mar 19 10:22:44 2009
All you have to do is,
post your code/erros within [ CODE ] and [ /CODE ] without the space around CODE
[Updated on: Thu, 19 March 2009 10:20] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Ora -1461 in RAC [message #392906 is a reply to message #392890] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 11:07 |
rsreddy28
Messages: 295 Registered: May 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Mahesh,
My apologies for the wrong format . I'll ensure that code tags will be used while writing to the forums for better readability.
And about that Ora-1461 , in the Metalink they gave a temporary fix:
1. Flush the shared pool.
2. Change the parameter SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS = 0
Can we do this in the production box . What will be the implications of this if we do .
Regards,
Raj
|
|
|
Re: Ora -1461 in RAC [message #392913 is a reply to message #392906] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 11:23 |
|
Michel Cadot
Messages: 68728 Registered: March 2007 Location: Saint-Maur, France, https...
|
Senior Member Account Moderator |
|
|
Quote: | Can we do this in the production box .
|
Can you continue without it?
Quote: | What will be the implications of this if we do .
|
Performances (highly) decrease.
Regards
Michel
[Updated on: Thu, 19 March 2009 11:23] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: Ora -1461 in RAC [message #392921 is a reply to message #392914] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 11:46 |
rsreddy28
Messages: 295 Registered: May 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Actually there is Document in the Metalink : 461911.1 , which says about it:
Apply Patch 6602742 or Also you can work around with this:
Flushing the shared pool can help remove the problem cursor from the shared pool.
-Using SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS = 0 can help in some cases.
|
|
|
|
Re: Ora -1461 in RAC [message #392946 is a reply to message #392923] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 14:22 |
rsreddy28
Messages: 295 Registered: May 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thanks Mahesh,
After discussing with our Team , we raised an SR and even they suggested the same and we decided for an RFC and planning to apply the Patch what Oracle has suggested.
And you were suggesting about another bug that is specific to RAC environment about my issue . I did searched a lot but couldn't find it . Can you please help me out in that so that if it's required we can plan even for that .
Regards,
Raj
|
|
|
|
|