SQL & PL/SQL
Finding islands are classic problems in PL/SQL. The basic concept is that you have some sort of numbers, like these: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26. The islands problem involves identifying ranges of existing values.
Finding gaps is classic problem in PL/SQL. The basic concept is that you have some sort of numbers (like these: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26), where there’s supposed to be a fixed interval between the entries, but some entries could be missing. The gaps problem involves identifying the ranges of missing values in the sequence. For these numbers, the solution will be as follows:
First, run the following code, to create tab1 table:
CREATE TABLE tab1
(with apologies to Robert Ludlum and Eric Van Lustbader)
Oracle performance tuning is an excellent source of myths. The very best ones have a group of adherents who continue to support the myth even when presented with counter-examples. Who’s heard of these?
- Joins are faster than sub-queries
- Sub-queries are faster than joins
- Full Table Scans are bad
Those ones have been around as long as I can remember. Probably the single greatest concentration of Oracle performance tuning myths centres on Bitmap Indexes. Are these familiar?
- Bitmap indexes are good for low-cardinality columns, whereas B-Tree indexes are good for high-cardinality columns.
- Bitmap indexes are slow to update.
- Bitmap indexes don't support concurrent updates.
This is first post of the four-part epic - The Bitmap Conspiracy - detailing the structure and behaviour of Bitmap Indexes. Later in the series we will cover the internal structure of Bitmap Indexes, how Oracle uses them, and finally we will expose some of the myths surrounding them. But before we get there let’s just get a clear understanding of what a Bitmap Index actually is.
I’ve been tuning Oracle database applications for a long time now. I started out recognising some simple patterns and applying template fixes (Got a full table scan? Use an index!) but such a collection of “Do this; don’t do that” anecdotes will only take you so far. If you are curious (I was), you can uncover the reasons why one method is faster than another; i.e. what is the computer doing to make slow code so slow. I found that a good understanding of the internals meant that you didn’t always need to know how to tune a specific example because you could work it out for yourself.
In a database application, these investigations frequently lead to data structures; how does the database store its information and how does it retrieve it? Good information on the internals of Bitmap Indexes is hard to piece together, so in Part 2 of this Bitmap Indexing epic we will look more closely at the internals of Bitmap indexes.
This is Part 3 of The Bitmap Conspiracy, a four part epic on Bitmap Indexes.
In Part 1 we touched briefly on how Oracle can use Bitmap Indexes to resolve queries by translating equality and range predicates into bitmap retrievals. Now that we know more about how they are stored (see Part 2), let’s look closer at some of the operations that Oracle uses to access Bitmap Indexes and manipulate bitmaps.
This is one of those myths that is probably best demonstrated by example. First, let’s create some test data: 10 million rows with the following columns:
- COL1 – Alternating values of 1 and 0 – not indexed
- COL2 – Identical to COL1 – bitmap indexed
- PAYLOAD – 100 bytes of X’s to make the rows a realistic width – not indexed
COL1 and COL2 are identical low cardinality columns: there are only two valid values.
I recently did a comparison caching mechanisms of scalar subquery caching(SSC) and deterministic functions in 11.2. Unfortunately, I do not have enough time to do a full analysis, so I will post it in parts.
1. Both mechanisms are based on hash functions.(About hash tables and hash collisions for scalar subquery caching excelent wrote Tom Kyte and Jonathan Lewis(“Cost-Based Oracle fundamentals” chapter 9))
2. Deterministic caching depends on fetch size(arraysize) – results cached only within one fetch call, ssc has no this limitation.
I want to share my modifications of Tom Kyte's runstats package, which include:
- Any number of runs sets for analyzing
- Standalone: No need to create other objects
- Ability to specify session SID for statistics gathering
- Ability to specify what to gather: latches, stats or both
- Separate mask filters for output by statname and latchname
- Ability to specify difference percentage for output separately for latches and statistics
- More accurate with some statistics because of avoiding global temporary table usage, but less in
Oracle Database A to Z question and answers and
very importantly the Experiences also you can share here...
The Blog is for Both the beginners and as well as experienced people to discuss and gain knowledge in Oracle.
Here we are going to share every thing about Oracle....
And Simply saying, we will only work on oracle related but nothing else here....
We will Eat Oracle, Drink Oracle and Walk Oracle